Disconnection from Nature
The Green Energy Movement
Please see the message in the following. It will reshape the way energy is used now and forever!
**fodi.biz***
We are an organization that firmly believes we have come up with a revolutionary development program. We must do this now. Let's come together, put our heads down, and work for a better, more enjoyable, and renewable life experience
Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin-top:0in; mso-para-margin-right:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt; mso-para-margin-left:0in; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;} The mission of, The Field of Dreams & Innovation LLC., capitalize on deregulation, create new and local jobs, help municipalities become more energy efficient, to rebuild and revitalize our public institutions in order to improve the overall experience of residents and business owners in our community, increase the production of green energies and technologies and eventually spread this model to surrounding communities abroad.
Thank you for listening to our message!
Sincerely,
The Founders of the Field of Dreams & Innovation
- FIELD OF DREAMS AND INNOVATION LLC.'s blog
- Login or register to post comments
- 126 reads






How extreme right wing politics of America, sound more and more like the La Brea tar pits for man kind.
The announcement by President Obama that the US would not seek a comprehensive climate deal at an upcoming global meeting in Copenhagen, Denmark next month is a gut punch to anyone who cares about the fate of the planet. A reading this past weekend of the elite press on this breakdown (The New York Times and The Washington Post for example) would have you believe it was just too tough politically to pull off.
Yet again activists are reduced to being happy that there is still another day, the next meeting is in Mexico, so a failed Copenhagen can be spun as an "important step forward." We are all starting to sound like co-dependents. This pattern has been consistent since the beginning of this process, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in Rio de Janeiro in 1992 (the Earth Summit). How can it be that after almost twenty years, scores of meetings, thousands of participants and calls to action by millions of people around the world the only reduction in greenhouse gas emissions has come from economic collapse, not international treaty?
President Obama was elected in part on his promise to deal with global warming. So were many new members of the House and Senate. Yet the consequence has been a climate bill in the House (Waxman-Markey) that gives away billions of dollars to the coal industry and doesn't get real greenhouse gas reductions for more than ten years. Worse still, the House bill has been followed up by an even weaker bill in the Senate, which is followed by a proposal from a few senators to trade away two long-time environmental gains (a ban on offshore drilling and a mothballed nuclear industry) for an even weaker deal. WHY?
The extractive industries still have more political power than the people. They use their money effectively to maintain and increase their political power. And who specifically are these people?
Missing from the mainstream accounts are the names of the real accomplices who rarely get identified due to their heavy advertising budgets in some of the same publications. Here's my list but I hope that you will feel free to nominate others.
ExxonMobil Corporation must top any list as it spent more than 22 millions dollars from 1998 through 2008 on front groups who, among other things, downplayed or denied the science on global warming.
The US Chamber of Commerce, the only group to outspend ExxonMobil in efforts to stop climate legislation.
The coal giants: Massey Energy Company, Peabody Energy and Arch Coal, Inc.
The coal industry front group: American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity.
The utilities: American Electric Power; Duke Energy and the Southern Company.
The American Petroleum Institute.
The National Association of Manufacturers.
How do we hold these entities and the people behind them accountable? Can we stand by while the people responsible for these companies steer our world into a nightmarish future? Is it time to bring the climate actions to their board meetings, country clubs and social events? You tell me.
Follow John Passacantando on Twitter: www.twitter.com/JPassacantando
Related News On Huffington Post:- Bohemian's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- 250 reads






US Senate hangs up policy on Climate Change.
Here's the link:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17764-success-of-us-climate-bill-hinges-on-health-care-reform.html
- Bohemian's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- 182 reads






Fewer Americans believe in Global Warming than three years ago...even though the ice caps are melting at an increasing rate.
Even though the ice caps are melting at an increased rate, fewer Americans believe the planet is warming:
http://news.aol.com/article/pew-poll-americans-cooler-on-global/731614
Here is a 2009 summary of scientific data showing that the planet is indeed warming:
http://www.aip.org/history/climate/20ctrend.htm
Not believing the planet is warming, doesn't change the fact, that the planet is indeed warming.
- Bohemian's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- 201 reads






DC Legislative Bill - Cleaning River and Consumer Awareness

DC LEGISLATIVE BILL DETAILS:
Anacostia River Cleanup and Protection Act of 2009
Talking Points
The legislation puts a new focus on reducing the amount of trash that enters the Anacostia River and creates a new fund dedicated to the cleanup and restoration of the Anacostia River. The legislation represents a unique attempt – as best we can tell, the first of its kind in the nation – to work with business and environmental leaders to develop a shared strategy to reduce the amount of trash in the Anacostia River. In addition, this initiative creates a partnership with Maryland to create a shared stewardship for the health of the entire Anacostia watershed.
Regarding Trash in the Anacostia River
- 20,000 tons of trash enters the Anacostia River each year.
- According to a recent report by the DC Dept. of the Environment, plastic bags, bottles, cans, snack wrappers and Styrofoam make up 85% of the trash in the Anacostia River.
- In the river’s tributaries, such as Watts Branch, nearly 50% of the trash is plastic bags.
- According to the report, placing a small fee on “free” bags could eliminate up to 47% of the trash in the tributaries and 21% from the river’s main stem.
- DC WASA removes 477 tons of trash from the Anacostia River each year; Anacostia Watershed Society volunteers have pulled another 536 tons of trash out of the River.
The Cost of Taking No Action
- EPA is establishing a new Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) of allowable trash in the Anacostia River and violations are likely to occur with each rainfall event, potentially costing the District millions of dollars annually.
- Each “free” bag that becomes litter already costs District residents:
- District agencies already spend millions on trash rather than people.
- DC WASA spends millions on Anacostia River trash removal, passed on to District rate payers in their monthly water bill.
- Continued pollution of the Anacostia River is dangerous and creates a potential risk to wildlife and marine life.
How the Initiative Works
- The legislation will place a small 5-cent fee on all single-use plastic and paper carryout bags from Retail Food Establishment license holders (which includes grocery stores, food vendors, convenience stores, drug stores, and others) and Class A and B liquor stores.
- The legislation requires that these plastic and paper carryout bags be recyclable.
Community Education and Outreach
- The legislation delays implementation for 6 months to a year, requiring the city to conduct an intensive public information campaign and outreach that includes providing reusable carryout bags to residents for free or low-cost, and work with service providers to distribute multiple reusable bags to seniors and low-income households.
How the Fee Would be Used
- The 5-cent fee will be divided between the business and a newly created Anacostia River Cleanup and Protection Fund.
- Businesses will retain either 1 or 2 cents of the fee, depending whether they offer customers a carryout bag credit program for reusable bags.
- The remaining amount of the fee will be deposited into the Fund to target environmental cleanup, reclamation, and restoration efforts on the Anacostia River, as well as continue a public education campaign and provide free reusable bags to DC residents, in particular the elderly and low income residents.
Where Has This Been Tried Before
- Other cities are moving in this direction. New York, Seattle, and many European nations have already required, or plan to require, a small charge for plastic and paper bags. These initiatives have dramatically cut down on these single-use bags – by as much as 90% in some places.
- In addition, many businesses are already taking similar steps on their own in addition to selling low-cost durable, reusable bags. Discount food stores like ALDI and Save-A-Lot, and even IKEA, charge customers a nominal fee for every bag – greatly reducing the number of plastic and paper bags used and encouraging customers to bring reusable bags.
A website, www.TrashFreeAnacostia.com, has been set up to support the Anacostia River Cleanup and Protection Initiative and to be a resource for information about the effort to reduce the amount of bags that enter the River.
- brie's blog
- 1 comment
- 794 reads





